🔗 Share this article

Families whose relatives buried in resting places at risk from coastal erosion argue that a lack of decision on how best to address the problem is causing them unnecessary distress concerning the final resting places of their departed family.

A Looming Threat to Historic Churchyards

Local authorities have singled out three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being consumed by the ocean in the coming decades.

A newly published study on the situation sets out a range of possible actions, from doing nothing to disinterring bodies and relocating them in more secure sites. Officials maintain it is for local people to determine how to proceed.

“Right now we’re in a state of uncertainty. It upsets me. My parents intended this to be their last home, but it isn’t going to be because of the sea.”

Estimates suggest at least part of one graveyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some residents worry it will happen much sooner. “In my view it’s got less than 20 years, if you consider what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” one said.

Haunted by the Ghosts of Eccles

A local business owner remembered a childhood visit to the neighbouring village of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the water, along with its church and graveyard.

“You could see human remains,” she said. “Some have this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get carried away to the ocean. They won’t. Individuals will take bones as mementos and go plundering graves in search of treasures. It’s completely undignified.”

“I fear that the identical fate that befell at Eccles will occur here and there’ll be skeletons on the beach. I would feel appalled by that.”

A Paratrooper's Grave in Jeopardy

Further up the shoreline lies the burial plot of a ex-soldier who died while serving overseas. His mother said she could not sleep after discovering her child's grave might one day be relocated.

“It truly trouble me to consider this won’t be his permanent home,” she said. “To our family it’s an important site to visit.”

In her view, new burials should cease but says it is too soon to disturb current plots. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an early decision needs to be made when a critical moment has been reached.”

Seeking Solutions and Clarity

An absence of consensus over when and how to tackle the problem has resulted in grieving relatives feeling exasperated and anxious.

Several families want more coastal protections to slow the inevitable erosion and to permit burials to continue for now. Different voices contend the time for relocation is approaching.

“It is very emotive,” said one relative. “The council’s report was really good, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is implemented. And everybody is washing their hands over who is accountable.”

A local official said the graveyards were under the care of the church authorities. “In the end it is down to them to choose the direction to take. Our role is here to assist them through that journey with residents.”

He added there was time to consider all the options. “We are talking many years before it starts to be lost.”

“There is no unified opinion on what should be done yet. It requires good community discussions to find the right solutions for each village.”

The possibility of losing the historic sites was described as one of “immense sadness for the local community,” but faith leaders also spoke of a belief in resurrection, offering a theological perspective on the temporal loss of sacred ground.